In the United States, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act 2009 was passed by the Uniform Law Commission, making it available to individual states for enactment as law. In 2010, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act was amended to add several options and renamed the Uniform Collaborative Law Rules and Act. In June 2013, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act was enacted in the states of Utah, Nevada, Texas, Hawaii, Ohio, the District of Columbia and Washington State and passed by the Alabama legislature, but was awaiting the governor`s signature and was still pending in several other U.S. states. States.  In Texas, the Family`s Attorney Harry Tindall, based in Houston, was instrumental in the texas legislature`s adoption of UCLA.  On the 24th. In March 2016, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed the Collaborative Law Process Act, Florida`s version of the Uniform Collaborative Law Act, which creates a legal privilege that allows for confidential communication during the collaborative process.  The IACP is an interdisciplinary organization whose members include lawyers, mental health professionals and financial specialists. National cooperation organizations have been established in many jurisdictions around the world, including Australia, Austria,  Canada, the Czech Republic, England, France, Germany, Israel, Hong Kong, Kenya, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, Scotland, Switzerland and Uganda, and the United States.
On Be-fulfilled.org there is an active online collaborative community. Financial professionals can be used to set the value of assets. In contentious legal proceedings, redundant expert opinions are often carried out by an expert for each party. The end result is the duplication of services at a higher cost and with increased distrust. This often leads to a costly expert war in court, where each expert testifies to their different assessments. As part of the collaborative process, the parties elect a neutral expert who is not assigned to either party. By establishing a relationship of trust, the parties agree to share the costs and agree to be bound by the estimated value. Below is a basic step-by-step process to show how most collaborative divorces work: Subject to paragraph (g), a court that is informed 30 days before the trial that the parties are using collaborative law procedures to attempt to resolve a dispute may not do so until a party notifies the court that the collaborative law proceeding has not resulted in a agreement: (1) fix a hearing or trial in the case; (2) fix time limits for investigations; (3) require compliance with scheduling orders; or (4) dismiss the case. Misrepresentation or withholding of information: If one of the lawyers believes that their client has intentionally misrepresented or concealed information contrary to the purpose of the collaborative process – wrongly or not – they may withdraw from the case. The client and the lawyer must accept the resignation; In England and Wales, Resolution has taken responsibility for the training and accreditation of all collaborative professionals.
 Almost one-third of all English family lawyers have now completed their cooperative training. In the Republic of Ireland, regional collaborative law associations have been established in cities such as Galway, Cork and Dublin. In France, AFPDC was founded in 2009 to develop and implement collaborative practices in France.  Restrictions on cooperation: Collaborative divorce is a voluntary process and there is no guarantee that the divorce will be successfully resolved. The parties acknowledge that not all concerns or feelings can be dispelled by a joint divorce; A number of states in the United States have their own individual organizations for collaborative law practitioners, including Collaborative Practice California, the Collaborative Family Law Council of Florida, the Collaborative Law Institute of Georgia, the Collaborative Law Institute of Illinois, the Collaborative Law Institute of Minnesota, the Collaborative Law Institute of North Carolina, Collaborative Divorce Texas and the Massachusetts Collaborative Law Law Council. and the Washington DC Academy of Collaborative Professionals. These mediator lawyers will also be able to use their mediation skills to promote the spirit of the Texas Alternative Dispute Resolution Act. Lawyer-mediators were often frustrated that once they assumed the role of mediators, they were unable to represent or advise the parties due to a conflict of roles. In some cases, no additional cost layer is required. Therefore, collaborative law offers the best of both worlds in these cases and lawyers can represent the interests of their clients while promoting the settlement process at an earlier stage.